Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Jeanne Larsen : Review


Jeanne Larsen:
Planting Seeds of Knowledge in Our Young Poetic Hearts
By Tyler Grant
English 204: Creative Writing- Poetry

            When I originally read Why We Make Gardens, I expected Jeanne Larsen to be a super old lady who tended her garden tenderly and lived a quiet life. (I didn’t see the picture on the back of the book.) But from the moment Ms. Larsen opened her mouth, she held her student audience captive.
            “Write what you want and if they don’t get it, tough on them,” she said. Never hold back and always pursue and write what interests you were her main themes throughout her talk. She encouraged all of us to pay special attention to our skills and techniques that we really liked when writing and exploit those skills to the fullest. I loved her passion. While she did mention that she had to do some things to make money, she knew that she was doing the thing she loved because she loved doing it.
Ms. Larsen demonstrated her skills with chiasmus and enjambment. She cites examples in several of her poems where she uses these literary techniques. For her, enjambment with the title allows an interesting segue into her opening line in the stanza. Her clever uses of chiasmus furthermore gives readers the chance to hold similar writing or rhythmic words on the same level and fully see the differences between the ideas. She gave examples like “tomb” and “womb” as well as  “breath” and “death.” With my interest in Def Jam Poetry, this is definitely a technique that I will be incorporating into my writing. Enjambment is also a useful tool that allows rhyming a phrase but keeping the thought going in a way as to further the idea.
I always enjoy hearing poets read their work. Jeanne Larsen read her work slowly, thoughtfully, and tenderly. This resembled the image that I had of her as a tender gardener carefully tending to her vegetables. I love the poems she read in class. Her favorite “Why We Make Gardens” is by far my favorite and definitely her most powerful. Why do we make gardens? Because we need “chambers for chaos.” This alliteration captures the need we, as a society, have for order and “rows.” The poem is also humbling because we realize that we are merely “dust”, a “star’s bread.” Our minds can, at times, miss the very deep meanings, the deep-rooted truths because we often buy into “fallacy’s wisdom.”
The last line of her poem, I believe, depicts the truth Jeanne Larsen wants us to seek: “Because we are physical. Because gardens are not.” Jeanne Larsen is not a garden poet. Jeanne Larsen is a human experience poet. And through a simple image of tomatoes, or rows of vegetables, she can arrange the chaos of this world into neat rows in our mind. From her talk, I hope that I can harvest my passions and sow truth from not only my work but others as well.

Monday, March 28, 2011

Alex Espinoza Reading Here at W&L, April 4


This reading counts as one of your literary events AND it's going to be VERY entertaining!

Friday, March 25, 2011

A Review of Poet Jeanne Larsen’s Visit to Class

Laura Persun

On Wednesday, March 16th, poet Jeanne Larsen, author of Why We Make Gardens, visited class to discuss the art of writing poetry. Larsen explained that obsessions are often valuable sources of inspiration (her obsessions are gardens and ancient Chinese culture), and when one writes about that which he or she is passionate, the quality of work frequently rises. She discussed the compromises that occur between a writer and a publisher, and read some of her poems aloud, subsequently annotating them for our benefit.
I was especially interested in the difference between prose and poetry. Larsen, though she is a well-known poet, has also published Silk Road: A Novel of Eighth-Century China. She explained that there exists a delicate equilibrium between heavy descriptions and flow; while often inclined to weigh down sentences with poetic prose and intense detail, she is forced to delete certain beautiful terms so that the reader will not lose interest. I am in the process of completing my English honors thesis, a creative novel based on Washington and Lee University, and frequently encounter the same complications as Larsen. Listening to her proposed solution for the problem of poetic prose gave me comfort and guidance as to how best approach the process of revision.
Why We Make Gardens has a distinct, tightly-woven theme: gardens. However, the gardens which Larsen cites are not those which routinely appear in fairy tales. Rather, Larsen discusses the “garden without chlorophyll”, the “garden of anger”, and the “garden of wood”. I chose to annotate several of her poems for my annotation project, and close analysis revealed the ways in which a loose interpretation of gardens is representative of the larger themes of life. For example, “A Garden without Chlorophyll”, which discusses the fungi and parasites which subsist off the resources of photosynthesizing plants, is arguably analogous to the division between those who conform and those who rebel in modern-day society. Larsen’s motives, as she pointed out, do not truly matter once the book is in the hands of the reader—we to free to interpret her work as we wish.

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

THE NUMBER OF THE BEAST: SESTINAS

The Number of the Beast

You know you really want to take on The Number of the Beast this week, right?! We'll be working with an ancient form of torture/I mean poetry, The Sestina. Some of the most contemporary and linguistically clever sestinas can be found online at http://www.mcsweeneys.net/links/sestinas/ - including poems about Maidenform bras, domesticated sestinas, Christian pop-stars, fake sestinas, salvation, reluctant sestinas…


Writing Prep: Read the chapter on Sestinas in 13 Ways. Be sure to read at least one of these sestinas out loud, to feel the way repetition of the six words helps the poet gather momentum for the envoi.

Basic Sestina Etiquette: six words, each coming at the end of a line, are repeated in a pre-determined order, ultimately forming six six-line stanzas; all six words are included in a final, 3-line stanza commonly called the envoi. The standard "illustration" for the order of the six words is:

1,2,3,4,5,6
6,1,5,2,4,3
3,6,4,1,2,5
5,3,2,6,1,4
4,5,1,3,6,2
2,4,6,5,3,1
2,5,4,3,6,1

You can find a line-by-line template in 13 Ways.

However, if you are one of those people who have difficulty keeping numbers straight, even in template form, try this: a “sestina generator”! No, it doesn’t write the poem for you; but it does take your six key words and order them correctly into six stanzas, plus the final 3-line stanza called an envoi. http://dilute.net/sestinas/ is the place to go. Once you’ve got your words in order, copy them down, and start having fun.

Suggestions:
1. choose words that “cluster” together: for example, two nouns, two verbs, two adjectives. Example: fountain, clarinet, trickle, slide, soft, striped.

2. pick a topic you want to write about and create a list of words that refer to that topic. Example: insomnia: heartbeat, eyes, pillow, sheets, toss, breath, clock, tick, sigh, darkness, book, tea, mattress, frustration, curse … then choose the six words that you feel are most likely to help you write this poem.

3. freewrite about a topic of your choice. Go for ten minutes, or until you find the beginning of your poem. Maybe even write the entire first draft of a poem. Maybe even take an OLD poem that you don’t much like or never finished. Pick out six words. Start the sestina pattern using those words.

4. Choose six words from a poem (by someone else) that you really, really love. Try to write out a six-sentence story, ending each one with one of those words. Start the sestina pattern.

5. Choose words that can have more than one meaning (even if it means spelling the word differently), or that can double as noun and verb; for example: swallow, right, wind, ring, bell, loft, keep, leaves, may, long, saw, nail, wind, sail…

6. Read the sestina “Anna Karenina (or, like, Most of It)” by Jonah Winter (below). Notice how Winter uses the repetition to his advantage by making some of his six words slang or idioms. Try a mix: nouns, adverbs, verbs, conjunctions, prepositions, articles, interjections. Consider trying to summarize one of the “greats” like Moby Dick, Last of the Mohicans, The Snows of Kilamanjaro, The Invisible Man, On the Road; a fairy tale; a TV series; a series of unfortunate events...

Anna Karenina (or, like, most of it)
by Jonah Winter

So, like, I read this really cool novel that was like
all about these different relationships?
You know like there were these different couples and like
some of the couples were like, okay, or whatever, but, there was this one couple that was like so
unhappy! I mean, it was like, WOW,
you know? The wife was like, married to this big dude

who was like, you know—
real intense. Dude,
I'm serious, this guy was like
majorly into making money and like, ignoring his wife, until she was just like: "Wow,
this is
NOT what I signed up for," right? I mean, like, their relationship
was like—Oh. My. God. —TOTALLY unfulfilling.
TOTALLY!!! So,
like, then there are these other characters too? And they've all got these like

in-CRED-ibly long names, and things like that. (I think they're like
related or something.) Anyway, like, so, this wife falls in love with this other dude
who's like, I guess,
*totally* amazing—and they are like SO
into each other it's not even funny. Seriously. She's just like
"Oh my God this is like a
real relationship.
Wow."

And then like, she goes to visit her brother or something.
Wow.
This is such an incredibly intense novel, it's hard to like
remember stuff. Okay. So, anyway, her brother's like also having problems in his relationship
with his wife. And his wife is like, "Dude,
what the
fuck?" And he's like
"What?" And she's like, "
That is just SO

uncool to just like, SMILE right now." Cause you know like he was like SO
busted when his wife you know like caught him with the maid? And his sister was like, "Wow,
so, I guess
you can't help me." And he was like,
"What-Ever." Or, you know, "RE
LAX." And she was like,
"Later, dude."
So then like
her husband finds out about her relationship—

and THAT is DEFINITELY not cool with him. And so then like THEIR relationship
actually gets like, even worse? Cause he is just like SO
telling her what to do and stuff, how he's gonna like, hurt her, and stuff, and she is like "Dude," I'm outta here." And so like she goes back to the other dude, and he is like "Wow,
it's really great to
see you!" And so like
I guess they're not, like, using protection that night? and so she gets like,

you know—pregnant. And that's when things get like
really fucked up in their relationship. Cause you know like they're not married or anything and so
she just goes "Wow.
Now I'm gonna have to OFF myself... DUDE!!!"



7. Just for fun, try this “Mad Libs Sestina” by Leah Fasulo. It gets your juices flowing and yes, it’s okay to laugh.

A Mad Libs Sestina

BY LEAH FASULO

Mad Libs Sestina: __exclamation__!

She steps out onto the yellow __noun (2 syllables)—A____
adv (2)__. "Goddamn you, __noun (3)__!" she shouts,
And her words ring like __adj (1)__ __noun (1)__ through the night.
The water is still but the lights are __adj (1)—B__.
And with every step, she __verb (1)__ __adv (3)—C__:
"Is that God's __body part (2)__ or is it my own?"

It isn't hard to __verb (2)__ on her own.
She just needs a __noun (2)__ on the __repeat A__.
Two suns and a moon have passed __repeat C__
But she feels like a __noun (2)__ when she shouts,
So she __verb (3)__ instead and feels __repeat B__
Like __adj (2)__ __color (1)__ at the end of the night.

Was her __noun (2)__ __adj (2)__ the other night?
Or did she just __verb (1)__ the __noun (1)__ of her own__
body part (1)__? The answer is in the __noun (2)__ of __repeat B__
Which is hidden deep under the __repeat A__
In the realm of __made-up word (3)__. If she shouts
__adv (1)__ enough, it will come out __repeat C__.

Rarely does she __verb (1)__ __plural noun (2)__ __repeat C__,
So instead she lies down for the __adj (1)__ night.
If she can't __verb (1)__ the __noun (2)__ with her shouts,
Then she'd rather just __verb (2)__ on her own.
Pulling a __noun (2)__ onto the __repeat A__,
She falls asleep, feeling __adj (2)__ and __repeat B__.

Once asleep, she __verb (2)__ and dreams of __repeat B
__Angels, each looking at her __repeat C__.
They __verb (1)__ their __adj (1)__ __body part (2)__ at the __repeat A__
And whisper, "__verb (1)__ the __noun (1)__, __girl's name (2)__. The night
Is __adj (2)__, and you surely do not own
The __noun (2)__." She awakes to her own shouts.

And to hers join other __adj (3)__ shouts,
Billowing into __ plural noun (1)__ of __adj (2)__ __repeat B__,
Reminding her that her __noun (1)__ is her own
Worst __noun (3)__, and she should __repeat C____
verb (2)__ the __adj (1)__ and __adj (1)__ __ plural noun (1)__ of the night:
At last, she __verb (3)__ the __repeat A__.

All night, the __adj (1)__ shouts of friends __verb (1)__ her __body part (1)__,
But she lets them __verb (2)__ __repeat C__ __repeat B__,
Ready to __verb (2)__ life on her own __repeat A__.


 

Other tips:  use homonyms (sun/son, whirled/world, time/thyme), enjambment of lines, plurals, phrases that include your word (house-of-cards when the end word is cards, boathouse when the end word is house) to rescue your sestina from the deadly repetitive machinery of the 6 word limitation.  Be creative, be inventive, take chances.  13 Ways also has two poems that are reverse Sestinas - the repeated 6 words all come at the beginning of the line, rather than the end.  One author also gave herself permission to use palindromes for words!


Here's my attempt at a Sestina, followed by those 6 Word Sestinas I promised you in class:



Jacinta’s Medicine
Jacinta Gonzalez, an Indian woman at Mission San Carlos (Carmel), worked at the restaurant frequented by Robert Louis Stevenson in Monterey, and was called on to nurse him during one of his severe illnesses in 1879. She also recorded gambling songs and a coyote myth for Alfred Kroeber in 1902. She passed away in the Influenza Epidemic of 1917.

It was the same old story:
witless white man gets lost, plants
himself face-first in the Carmel hills, dreamy head
translating scent of oak into black words.
But mean spirits hunt the soft breath
of lonely men like that, take what’s left.

They pierce the body like knives, leave
a man swollen with poisonous stories.
Now he lies abed, fevered, breath
rattling his throat like a dried up plant.
They call for me: Jacinta, you know words.
Come lay your hands on his forehead.


But what I know are medicines from heads
much older than mine; crushed leaves
gathered from windswept hills, not words
so much as roots, not roots so much as story.
I made a plaster for his chest, planted
a mugwort bundle under his pillow. Breathe,

I hummed into his glittering eyes, breathe.
Heard the dark buzzing inside his head,
knew the spirits wanted to supplant
his soul. Between his fingers I left
the sticky cobwebs of a story.
The only cure for ghost words

are salty cleansing waves of words.
Sail oceans, I said, dream islands, give breath
to your own cure. Make up a story,
scare the poison out of your head;
I’ll catch it in my hand when it leaves,
strangle it, burn it, plant

the ashes under a redwood.
I planned
to sit up all night. He muttered words
in his sleep: pirate, treasure, shore leave.
When the sun rose, his breath
turned easy, his pale creased forehead
cooled. Just one more hard-luck story.

My plants gave him back his breath.
Together, we dreamt words to clear his head,
ordered poison to leave. The rest is history.
                                  - Deborah A. Miranda




A few poets have even created more of a challenge for themselves, by creating '6 word' Sestinas.  Check these two out:


Six Words
by Lloyd Schwartz

yes         
no
maybe
sometimes
always
never

Never?
Yes.
Always?
No.
Sometimes?
Maybe—

maybe
never
sometimes.
Yes—
no
always:

always
maybe.
No—
never
yes.
Sometimes,

sometimes
(always)
yes.
Maybe
never . . .
No,        

no—
sometimes.
Never.
Always?
Maybe.
Yes—

yes no
maybe sometimes
always never.



Valentine Sestina
by Peter Pereira

So
I
love
always.
Will
you?

You
so
will
I
always
love.

Love
you
always,
so
I
will.

Will
love
I
you
so
always?

Always
will
so
love
you
I.

I
always
you
will
love
so.

I will
always love
you so.


Don't be afraid of the Sestina form. It is well-suited to rants (or what some poets call "Rantinas"), descriptions of ritual, and to long, cyclical, repetitive patterns about human relationships, physics, biology, and the cosmos. Your aim here is to go with the flow. Don't resist. You do have to give up some control, but then again, it's good to practice giving up control gracefully!  Stay directed and focused. Sestinas are a little like riding the rapids of a very fast river. Grab your life-jacket. 

What We Talk about When We Talk about Revision

Revision was the topic of discussion during the Writer-in-Residence Reading on March 21st. W&L's own Jasmine Darznik, Deborah Miranda, and R. T. Smith read from their own personal published works after describing the revision process their works undertook during construction. Darznik brought her memior-like novel to read from and described her revision process. She explained that every time she would continue to write her novel, she would reread everything she had read up to that point, and revise as she went along. She said that the beginning portions of her novel were revised over 200 times, and even when she read that afternoon, she revised her work, leaving some parts out as she read aloud. Deborah Miranda took a different approach to revise her poetry. In fact, she had three different revision processes that she exemplified with the three poems that she read. Her first method was to let the poem sit, which Miranda did for 2 years. After that time apart, Miranda said she was finally able to see the poem and revised it. Her second method was to free write and condense from there (very similar to what we do in her ENGL 204 class). The third method I unfortunately cannot remember.... Darn my short term memory. Smith's method of revision is very similar to both Darznik and Miranda's: going over his work and figuring out what he believes fits into his short story and what does not. He even said that he was not afraid to delete entire portions and paragraphs if he felt that that was not the direction he wanted his story to travel.

With all that said, there were some memorable quotes that came out of the Q&A.

One of the answers as to "Why?" was to make "More passionate syntax." This is a great line that, as pointed out, is essential to poetry. With parameters such as 14 line sonnet or a 5 syllable line in a haiku, words are limited, making it essential that each and everyone of them is "passionate." This also applies to writing, which Darznik pointed out in her story from her experience as a student. She described how her teacher demanded Darznik to imagine at the bottom of every page, the "invisible reader" asked, "So what?" An importance of revision is make sure that everything said has meaning.

When asked, "What is the percentage of the time that you condense during revision or expand?" Darznik said, "The fat has to be sizzled down. Seared." Miranda actually gave a percentage, "80-20," believing that most of her work needs to be condensed, however, there are those time where more is necessary, which she used one of her poems as an example.

On fellow asked, "How do you motivate yourself to write?" And my favorite answer was the story Smith gave. I do not remember who the famous people are, but he told a story about a famous author, who I will name Sally, and her husband, Anthony. Sally was having trouble writing her story and became so infuriated she tossed her typewriter out the window and screamed at her husband that she could no longer write and just could not do it. Anthony's response, "Then quit! No one will miss you." Sally then began to write, showing exactly how everyone would miss her without this piece of literature.

Listening to the authors in front of me, I felt like I could most relate to Darznik and Miranda. Every time I reread my poetry, I revise it, either in a huge way or just the small particulars. But I start out with my free write and then condense from there. I'm not quite sure how to wrap this up, but that is what you guys missed (minus Jeremy)!

Sunday, March 20, 2011

Response to: "Desperate Times and Desperate Measures: Poetry Out of the Ivory Tower?"


Carrie Hopkins

After just leaving the talk, my head is still whirling with thoughts. Smith discussed how poetry is needed in times of desperation.  His point is that people need to read poetry, but they also need to write it.  Poetry consoles us and heals us when we need it most.   I immediately thought of the poem we read in class on Wednesday.  Until that poem I had been ignoring Japan, glossing over it in the news, saying the “oh isn’t it awful” with no real thought, because I was protecting myself.  After class I went home and read article after article immersing myself in the pain and the destruction of what was going on in Japan.  I called my mom and she told me a story that caused me to read the poem from class again.  The story is about a man who lived in a fishing village and after the first earthquake realized the possibility of a tsunami. He got in his car and started to drive.  When he got to a tunnel that you have to go through to get out of this remote area he was stuck in a line of traffic.  He knew too much time had gone by and instead of waiting in the traffic he drove up the hill and parked his car to get on higher ground.  Time passed and he watched waves come in and flow through the tunnel washing out the lines of traffic he could have been in.  That story broke my heart. I reread Etc. a couple times after hearing that story, just to try and find some meaning in it all.  I am still struggling to find the meaning.  The reading tonight helped though.
Smith forced me to look at the disasters that have happened during the course of my lifetime and beyond that.  He made me listen to poetry that healed people before and that could maybe heal me now.  The one poem he read, Collin’s response to 9/11, really moved me. Just the sheer names of people who died then and are dying or missing now in Japan are unimaginable and in a way uncountable.  Sure we can put a number on how many people have died, but we cannot count what they mean, or what they could have meant. Professor Kennedy added to this feeling with her poems that linked the treatment of witches to the Iraq war.  Her poetry was unexpected and horrifying.  She made a joke about weak stomachs before reading her poem T, but to be honest it made me feel sick. Growing up in a Quaker school war has always been cruel and unimaginable to me. To hear her put that cruelness into words that stick with you meant a lot. I am really thankful to have chosen this reading to attend, because it was just what I needed during my own brink of desperation. 

And this just in, from the New York Times:
The Poetry of Catastrophe

Even devoted followers of the news seem overwhelmed by the sheer volume of horrific events unfolding just now — in particular the continuing bloodshed in the Arab world and the ever-worsening story of the earthquake-tsunami-nuclear crisis in Japan. These headlines recall the most frightening chapters of antiquity, times of pestilence and war, a steady mood of darkening apocalypse.

Reports From the World of Books
To a great extent, literature has provided us with the imagery and vocabulary of disaster: whether the Bible, with its plagues and floods, its terrible judgments (“Ah sinful nation, a people laden with iniquity, a seed of evildoers, children that are corrupters”); or Greek tragedy, with its blood-crimes and murderous revenges.
What follows is a sampler of literary catastrophe. Don’t run away. It’s not as depressing as it sounds. One of the enduring paradoxes of great apocalyptic writing is that it consoles even as it alarms.

This has been, in fact, one of the enduring “social” functions of literature — specifically, of poetry. Narrative prose is less well suited to the task. This isn’t surprising: narrative implies continuity and order — events that flow forth in comprehensible sequence, driven by motive forces of cause and effect. To tell a “story,” whether real or invented, is to presume at least the possibility of rational understanding.

But catastrophe defies logic. It faces us with disruption and discontinuity, with the breakdown of order. The same can often be said of poetry itself. It operates outside the realm of “logic.” Rather, it obeys the logic of dreams, of the unconscious. This is especially the case with lyric poetry, with its suggestion of vision and prophecy.

“Catastrophe is indeed already the condition of language, the condition of the ruins of time,” Harold Bloom, perhaps the foremost living scholar of lyric poetry, wrote in his book “Agon” (1982). Poems, he argued, are “gnostic catastrophe creations” — the term gnostic derived from the ancient religious doctrine, or heresy, that creation is itself a form of catastrophe, a string of disasters generated by a flawed creator.

Indeed for Bloom, the very act of writing a poem entails a kind of crisis. The outward drama the poet responds to mirrors the interior one he struggles with all his life. As one of Bloom’s favorite creations, Milton’s Satan, declares in “Paradise Lost”:

The mind is its own place, and in itself
Can make a heav’n of hell, a hell of heav’n.

A decade ago, after the 9/11 attacks, The New Yorker published Adam Zagajewski’s poem “Try to praise the mutilated world.” Though written in 2000, Zagajewski’s verse presciently distilled the drastically altered American mood. “You’ve seen the refugees heading nowhere,” Zagajewski had written, or prophesied. “You’ve heard the executioners sing joyfully.” Those words are relevant again today, as Japan’s “nuclear refugees” are streaming into the mountains, and the governments of Libya and Yemen train fire on protesting citizens.

Another poem much quoted after 9/11 was W. H. Auden’s “September 1, 1939,” written at the outbreak of World War II, but again utterly contemporary in its intimation of anxiety:

Waves of anger and fear
Circulate over the bright
And darkened lands of the earth,
Obsessing our private lives;
The unmentionable odor of death
Offends the September night.

The truth is that terrible forebodings — “the dark/Encroachment of that old catastrophe,” as Wallace Stevens described it (in “Sunday Morning”) — inform much of  the Anglo-American poetic tradition.

Its preeminent master is Shakespeare. Lear on the heath, his world destroyed, dares the unseen demons of nature to afflict him with yet greater punishments:

Blow, winds, and crack your cheeks! rage! blow!
You cataracts and hurricanoes, spout
Till you have drench’d our steeples, drown’d the cocks!
You sulph’rous and thought-executing fires,
Vaunt-couriers to oak-cleaving thunderbolts,
Singe my white head! And thou, all-shaking thunder,
Strike flat the thick rotundity o’ th’ world,
Crack Nature’s moulds . . .

Walt Whitman captured the helplessness of a grief-stricken nation after Lincoln’s assassination in “When Lilacs Last in the Door-Yard Bloom’d,” with its sorrowing images of the funeral procession, the

Coffin that passes through lanes and streets,
Through day and night, with the great cloud darkening the land,
With the pomp of the inloop’d flags, with the cities draped in black,
With the show of the States themselves, as of crape-veil’d women, standing,
With processions long and winding, and the flambeaus of the night,
With the countless torches lit—with the silent sea of faces, and the unbarred heads
With the waiting depot, the arriving coffin, and the sombre faces,
With dirges through the night, with the thousand voices rising strong and solemn;
With all the mournful voices of the dirges, pour’d around the coffin,
The dim-lit churches and the shuddering organs — Where amid these you journey,
With the tolling, tolling bells’ perpetual clang . . .

In the 20th century, too, catastrophe has inspired memorable verse. In “The Second Coming,” W. B. Yeats distilled the loss of coherent order caused by World War I and the rise of Bolshevism:

Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

All this prompted Yeats to declare, or hope, “Surely some revelation is at hand.”

In the 1950s, a decade shadowed by fears of nuclear extinction, many quoted T. S. Eliot’s poem “The Hollow Men,” written in 1925. Its taunting, nursery-rhyme conclusion seems to predict the technological apocalypses of a later time, including our own:

This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
This is the way the world ends
Not with a bang but a whimper.

This is only a sampler. Other, more learned poetry readers, no doubt, can furnish additional verses. Please send them along. To name the catastrophic demon won’t slay it. But it can help chase our fears out of the shadows and into the sunlight.